“The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.”
F. Scott Fitzgerald
“…women who have already gone into menopause have started bleeding again. So there’s a lot of disfunction going on with regards to the female reproductive system and this is very, very, very serious.”
Jessica Rose, Phd
Notable timestamps:
18:37 lays out the time-correlative argument for causality being demonstrated by VAERS reports
25:06 discussion of female reproductive serious adverse events
The pharmaceutical industry has never cared about women. The very real and undeniable preponderance of evidence that these vaccines really are causing menstrual issues in women in large numbers will continue to be downplayed. It is therefore up to women themselves to make the conscious decision to reject the idea that taking these absurdly invasive shots is an act for the public good, which never made sense under any applied scrutiny given the egregious lack of long term-data.
At the start of April, an associate professor at the University of Illinois posted about her post-vaccine experience on Twitter. After receiving hundreds of replies from users who also reported similar menstrual changes, she started a survey that apparently garnered 22,000 responses.
“It suggests it’s a real phenomenon, and that we need to understand what’s occurring physiologically”
-Dr. Jerilynn Prior, scientific director for the Centre for Menstrual Cycle and Ovulation Research (CemCOR), and professor of endocrinology and metabolism at the University of British Columbia.
No woman under 50 should be getting this vaccine. They have minimal risk of dying from COVID, the vaccines appear particularly dangerous to them just in terms of the short term data, which does not portend anything positive in terms of the all-told picture, and getting a briefly vetted novel medication for the sake of that medication’s (still not assured) herd immunity is absurd; quadruply so once one realizes the preposterousness of acting as if such a thing is solely the purview of artificial methods (or even that artificial methods will be comparably robust, which is yet to be seen, and given the precedents, highly dubious).
It’s a dereliction of basic medical prudence all the way through, and could not have become the agreed upon policy were our agencies not clearly aligned with the pharmaceutical companies; no rational society shotguns experimental treatment.
Furthermore, as any rational society values its children first and foremost, any concerns I have for the long term well being of women apply to the long term well-being of children a hundred fold. Were this a test of humanity’s worth, many of us would have failed for losing sight of that so easily.
A note from the Twilight Zone: while not to the pronounced degree of the undeniable slew of issues stemming from direct vaccination, a surprising bevy of anecdotal reports have accumulated of those simply being around or exposed to those who have been vaccinated experiencing anomalous issues.
The tendency to dismiss such concerns outright is exactly the wrong thing. That’s not to say they are to be believed automatically either, however, given that the official response has been outright dismissal, I don’t need to make any arguments for the dubiousness of such phenomena; they have already been made.
I will, however, make a couple points or allowances in favor of taking such concerns seriously, because that is the side we should err on, even if it entails a little bit of wrongthink, which I’ve always found to enhance perspective.
Wrongthink 1: We’ve messed up the “use virus to help us” idea before many times, and I trust zero guarantees in virology, ever; the field is much harder to make reliable sense of than, say, dealing with bacteria, which are much more substantial, and are more clearly life forms of the sort with which we’re familiar.
While the adenovirus vectors (J&J and AZ) may not be “live attenuated” virus vaccines in the sense of already being expected to be poorly replication competent, they are still “live attenuated” in the sense of being cell-entry mechanisms, and given mass administration and little experience with doing so, I put nothing past variability. We’ve underestimated the unexpected in this field before.
My first inference when I ran into the anecdotes about secondhand menstrual issues was that if they were to be taken at face value, it was plausibly a synchronization issue. But the nature of the issues described, the prospect of them occurring after male contact also, and the fact that synchronization itself has taken some hits under investigation (https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-37256161) suggests that if this is a real phenomenon, something else would have to be invoked to explain it.
https://www.nature.com/articles/3300902
“Who’s scared of replication-competent adenoviruses?”
I am.
“RCA are revertant vectors that reacquired the E1 region as a result of homologous recombination with E1 sequences integrated in the helper cells.”
Lovely. Clearly the kind of discipline that allows for summary dismissals.
And tangentially related, I wonder who has gotten the vector shots and been aware of this precedent: https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/110/6/1916/24190/Adenoviral-vectors-persist-in-vivo-and-maintain?fbclid=IwAR2eJfPZetWR_es2ZFeHO8-Ys2_Bq7tXRnzZwODajk-QMJwvZENHi0rrItA
How many people would have taken the shot if studies like the one above had gotten any press? Long term persistence is exactly what many have feared. Have they eliminated such a phenomenon, or has it been swept under the rug just like everything else that would be unsettling to the public?
What of the mRNA class?
We are not entirely without a theoretical mechanism.
It’s a veridical fact that misfolded proteins can be dangerous and transmissible.
https://www.news-medical.net/health/How-Do-Prion-Diseases-Spread.aspx
Making the body into a little factory strictly for proteins that bear resemblance to what forms these is fine unless it’s not. That this could be happening cannot be comprehensively be ruled out without investigation.
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202003.0422/v1
Wrongthink 2: I estimate many authorities would do just such a thing if they could.
In other words, I think that many of the religious proselytizers of this vaccinate-or-bust paradigm really would try to surreptitiously “vaccinate” (anything out of a needle, right?) the whole world if they could get away with it. I don’t think they have the sort of moral code that would prevent it. After all, they always know best, even when it may appear to some of us that they’re cavalierly sidestepping what are supposed to be their plenary first principles.
This alone should be unsettling. I like my leaders constrained by a sense of respect for individual sovereignty that is erred in favor of under ambiguity. I don’t think many of them are.
One may optimistically point out that the fact that many of them have Napoleonic mentalities is constrained by degrees by what they can or would bother trying to get away with. But that’s it. Very few of them would be given the Ring of Gyges and behave with any steadfast respect for the rights of others. Nothing else can be said about people who would lock us down with vaccine passports for not taking a long-term untested medical intervention that can obviously be administered to those who can choose it for themselves if they consider it a favorable risk.
Bill Gates, for one, doesn’t have any moral hangups about making decisions for people. In the third world, where it is much easier to get away with malfeasance, his track record is abysmal, and he has unequivocally ignored the laws of informed consent.
[The above two sources are for the HPV vaccines in India. The fact that the ethical requirement of informed consent was brazenly ignored cannot be sincerely disputed.
What is disputed is whether purported tetanus shots in Africa and South America have been used for the purposes of clandestine sterilization. I’ve read both the papers laying out the evidence for such a phenomenon, and the rebuttals wondering aloud why such claims “refuse to die” (https://africacheck.org/fact-checks/blog/analysis-why-does-old-false-claim-about-tetanus-vaccine-safety-refuse-die). Why? Perhaps because it keeps being re-alleged. The replicability of the allegations is not proof; but a lot of them come from places where the women wouldn’t have readily had access to accusations from other countries, and yet it happens in many countries across continents nonetheless.
For anyone interested, I invite a reading of the following paper, which is actually an addendum to one of the papers describing the detection of hCG in the tetanus vaccinations in response to the various attempts at its “debunking”.
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/3/11
Some advice to the organizations accused: You can minimize accusations by not strictly targeting women of childbearing age with treatment regimens correspondent to those that would be used for sterilization instead of inoculation for tetanus. That way everyone would know it couldn’t work for that, because those regimens are so very important for producing a fertility dampening effect. Boom. Problem solved. Thank me any time you like for saving you from your three-decade PR headache.]
If Gates and those with similar complexes aren’t making any decisions in advance for us here, it’s because of logistical obstacles (like the hinderance of things like coordination without someone leaking information and the subsequent likelihood of getting caught) or a lack of perceived benefit; not moral reservations. That has to factor into anyone’s rational consideration.
And the technology for self-spreading vaccines itself certainly does exist and has for some time, so what is being described is not science fiction in the overall sense, regardless of whether it might apply to the current mechanism or not.
https://jhsphcenterforhealthsecurity.s3.amazonaws.com/181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf
P 47 online, 45 in print
“Self-spreading vaccines”
Bull JJ, Smithson MW, Nuismer SL. Transmissible viral vaccines.
Trends Microbiol 2018;26(1):6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2017.
09.007. Accessed June 25, 2018.
Murphy AA, Redwood AJ, Jarvis MA. Self-disseminating vaccines for emerging
infectious diseases. Expert Rev Vaccines 2016;15(1):31-39. https://doi.org/10.158
6/14760584.2016.1106942. Accessed June 25, 2018.
Nuismer SL, Althouse BM, May R, Bull JJ, Stromberg SP, Antia R. Eradicating
infectious disease using weakly transmissible vaccines. Proc Biol Sci
2016;283(1841). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1903. Accessed June 25,
2018.
Torres JM, Sánchez C, Ramírez MA, et al. First field trial of a transmissible
recombinant vaccine against myxomatosis and rabbit hemorrhagic disease.
Vaccine 2001;19(31):4536-4543. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00184-0.
Accessed June 25, 2018.
Tsuda Y, Caposio P, Parkins CJ, et al. A replicating cytomegalovirus-based
vaccine encoding a single Ebola virus nucleoprotein CTL epitope confers
protection against Ebola virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011;5(8):e1275.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001275. Accessed June 25, 2018.
https://www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/Live-Virus-Vaccines-and-Vaccine-Shedding.pdf
https://www.nature.com/articles/3300902
Personally, the more I’ve learned about the powers that be, and their disgusting blackmail schemes (as in the case of the Epstein scandal, which was far from being the world’s only high-level honeypot/blackmail operation) the less I find concerns about their behavior to be irreverently dismissible.
I’m aware that to many this is the wrongthink of non-rejection; you supposedly have to eliminate certain ideas off-hand to show you’re not one of those crazy types. But I’ve found entertaining conspiratorial motives highly predictive; I think collusion is far more common than would be naively suspected, and I’m willing to entertain that many powerful people have plans for the world they haven’t consulted the rest of us on. As a result, I simply will not eliminate such notions so as to be viewed as more hygienic by people who think that it’s unseemly to “go there”.
In any event, I find myself considerably more willing to engage in social distancing. Perhaps it’s a win all around.